McElroy v. CDC et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/27/2017 ADOPTING IN FULL 12 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 5 , 6 , 10 Motions for Injunctive Relief. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JABBARI McELROY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2271-KJM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
CDC, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 6, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. After an extension of time, plaintiff
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court
26
finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 6, 2017, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 5, 6, 10) are denied.
4
DATED: March 27, 2017.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?