Chambers v. Price et al

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/11/2018 DENYING as moot 44 Request for Assistance Regarding the Settlement. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEROME CHAMBERS, 12 13 14 No. 2: 15-cv-2274 GEB KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEROME PRICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 20, 2017, the undersigned conducted a settlement conference 19 in this action. The parties reached a settlement and agreed to voluntarily dismissed this action. 20 (ECF No. 40.) 21 On July 2, 2018, plaintiff filed his second request regarding the settlement. (ECF No. 44.) 22 Plaintiff states that under the terms of the settlement, he was to be paid $7000.00, but he only 23 received $5,000.00. 24 The undersigned has listened to the recording of the settlement placed on the court record. 25 The parties agreed to settle this case for payment of $5,000.00, with the understanding that such 26 proceeds would first be applied to plaintiff’s restitution. The recording of the settlement confirms 27 the undersigned’s handwritten notes that the settlement was for $5,000.00. Plaintiff has provided 28 a copy of his inmate statement report that reflects he was credited $5,000.00. The sum of 1 1 $3,716.99 was applied to restitution and an administrative fee, and the balance of $1,283.01 was 2 deposited in plaintiff’s inmate account. (ECF No. 44 at 4.) Thus, the settlement proceeds of 3 $5,000.00 were properly applied, and no further assistance from the court is required. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for assistance regarding 5 the settlement (ECF No. 44) is denied as moot. 6 Dated: July 11, 2018 7 8 9 /cw/cham2274.set 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?