Chambers v. Price et al
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/11/2018 DENYING as moot 44 Request for Assistance Regarding the Settlement. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEROME CHAMBERS,
12
13
14
No. 2: 15-cv-2274 GEB KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JEROME PRICE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 20, 2017, the undersigned conducted a settlement conference
19
in this action. The parties reached a settlement and agreed to voluntarily dismissed this action.
20
(ECF No. 40.)
21
On July 2, 2018, plaintiff filed his second request regarding the settlement. (ECF No. 44.)
22
Plaintiff states that under the terms of the settlement, he was to be paid $7000.00, but he only
23
received $5,000.00.
24
The undersigned has listened to the recording of the settlement placed on the court record.
25
The parties agreed to settle this case for payment of $5,000.00, with the understanding that such
26
proceeds would first be applied to plaintiff’s restitution. The recording of the settlement confirms
27
the undersigned’s handwritten notes that the settlement was for $5,000.00. Plaintiff has provided
28
a copy of his inmate statement report that reflects he was credited $5,000.00. The sum of
1
1
$3,716.99 was applied to restitution and an administrative fee, and the balance of $1,283.01 was
2
deposited in plaintiff’s inmate account. (ECF No. 44 at 4.) Thus, the settlement proceeds of
3
$5,000.00 were properly applied, and no further assistance from the court is required.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for assistance regarding
5
the settlement (ECF No. 44) is denied as moot.
6
Dated: July 11, 2018
7
8
9
/cw/cham2274.set
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?