Lena v. Foulk, et al.
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/8/2017 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL ANGELO LENA,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-2276 TLN DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
FRED FOULK, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action under
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed May 11, 2016 (ECF No. 17), plaintiff’s complaint was
19
dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On December 27,
20
2016 (ECF No. 28), plaintiff was given an additional thirty days to file an amended complaint.
21
Plaintiff was advised that his failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. Thirty days
22
from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise
23
responded to the court’s order.
24
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
26
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
27
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
28
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1
1
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
2
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
3
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
4
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
Dated: February 8, 2017
6
7
8
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/lena2276.fta
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?