Cook, et al. v. City of Fairfield, et al.

Filing 43

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/26/17 ORDERING that the Discovery deadline is EXTENDED to 04/13/17. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 Email: gfox@bfesf.com Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF FAIRFIELD, WALT TIBBET, REBECCA BELK, AARON BERTSCH, FRANK PIRO, KELLY ROMBACH, ADAM BRUNIE, CHRISTOPHER GRIMM and KEITH PULSIPHER 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 BILLY ROBERT COOK, MICHAEL JOHN MAROULAS, AND BECKY SMISEK-GAGE, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Case No. 2:15-cv-02339- KJM-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FACT AND EXPERT DISCOVERY HONORABLE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, a municipal corporation; FORMER CITY OF FAIRFIELD POLICE CHIEF WALT TIBBET, in his individual and official capacities; REBECCA BELK and AARON BERTSCH, individually and in their official capacities as police sergeants for the City of Fairfield, FRANK PIRO, KELLY ROMBACH, MARK APLEY, ADAM BRUNIE, CHRISTOPHER GRIMM, KEITH PULSIPHER, and DOES 1-50, individually and in their capacities as peace officers, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY Cook, et al. v City of Fairfield, et al. Case No.: 2:15-cv-02339-KJM-KJN 1 Plaintiffs Billy Robert Cook, Michael John Maroulas, and Becky Smisek-Gage (“Plaintiffs”), 2 acting by and through their attorney of record, and defendants City of Fairfield, Walt Tibbet, Rebecca 3 Belk, Aaron Bertsch, Frank Piro, Kelly Rombach, Mark Apley, Adam Brunie, Christopher Grimm, and 4 Keith Pulsipher (“Defendants”), acting by and through their attorney of record, hereby represent to the 5 Court as follows: 6 7 On October 14, 2016 this Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order (Docket 35) setting, among other deadlines, a cutoff for all discovery of November 10. 2017. 8 At the time that the Pretrial Scheduling Order was issued, Defendants’ July 15, 2016 Motion to 9 Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (Docket 27) was still pending, having been heard on October 7, 10 11 12 2016. As of the date of this stipulation, no Order has been issued on the Motion to Dismiss, which remains pending. 13 The parties have conducted some discovery, including the exchange of written discovery, but are 14 limited in their ability to complete further fact discovery, given the uncertainty of the pleadings in the 15 absence of an Order on the pending Motion to Dismiss. 16 A five month extension of time for fact and expert discovery will allow the parties to conduct full 17 and complete discovery in this case. Therefore, the parties request that the cutoff for all discovery now 18 set for November 10, 2016 be continued by five months to April 13, 2018. 19 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: September 26, 2017 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL By: /s/ Parry Black Parry Black Attorney for Defendant CITY OF FAIRFIELD, WALT TIBBET, REBECCA BELK, AARON BERTSCH, FRANK PIRO, KELLY ROMBACH, ADAM BRUNIE, CHRISTOPHER GRIMM and KEITH PULSIPHER 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY Cook, et al. v City of Fairfield, et al. Case No.: 2:15-cv-02339-KJM-KJN 1 Dated: September 26, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF JUSTIN KIRK TABAYOYON 2 By: /s/ Justin Kirk Tabayoyon (as authorized on 9/19/17) Justin Kirk Tabayoyon Attorney for Plaintiffs 3 4 5 6 ____________________________________________________________________________________ 7 ORDER 8 Good cause appearing, the Stipulation is SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: September 26, 2017. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY Cook, et al. v City of Fairfield, et al. Case No.: 2:15-cv-02339-KJM-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?