Cook, et al. v. City of Fairfield, et al.

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 01/04/16 ORDERING that, pursuant to 7 Amended Stipulation, the Initial Scheduling Conference is RESET for 3/14/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. with a join t status report due 14 days prior. Further, plaintiffs are notified under Rule 4(m) of the FRCP that failure to serve Defendants Tibbet, Belk, Bertsch, Piro, Rombach, Apley, Brunie, Grimm, and Pulsipher with process within the time period prescribed in that Rule may result in the unserved defendant(s) being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, by 03/28/16, plaintiffs shall file proof of service for these defendants or a sufficient explanation why service was not completed within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period.(Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

BILLY ROBERT COOK, MICHAEL
JOHN MAROULAS, and BECKY
SMISEK-GAGE,

10

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

2:15-cv-02339-GEB-KJN

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M)
NOTICE

Plaintiffs,

11
12

No.

v.
CITY OF FAIRFIELD, a
municipal corporation; FORMER
CITY OF FAIRFIELD POLICE
CHIEF WALT TIBBET, in his
individual and official
capacities; REBECCA BELK and
AARON BERTSCH, individually
and in their official
capacities as police
sergeants for the City of
Fairfield, FRANK PIRO, KELLY
ROMBACH, MARK APLEY, ADAM
BRUNIE, CHRISTOPHER GRIMM,
KEITH PULSIPHER, and DOES 150, individually and in their
capacities as peace officers,
Defendants.

21
22
23

Pursuant to the Amended Stipulation and Proposed Order

24

Continuing Case Management Conference filed on December 30, 2015,

25

(ECF

26

continued to March 14, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report

27

shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the

28

Status Conference.

No.

7),

the

Status

(Pretrial

1

Scheduling)

Conference

is

1

Further, Plaintiffs are notified under Rule 4(m) of the

2

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendants

3

Walt

4

Rombach, Mark Apley, Adam Brunie, Christopher Grimm, and Keith

5

Pulsipher with process within the time period prescribed in that

6

Rule may result in the unserved defendant(s) being dismissed. To

7

avoid dismissal, on or before March 28, 2016, Plaintiffs shall

8

file

9

explanation

10

Tibbet,

proof

of
why

Belk,

service

for

service

was

Aaron

these
not

prescribed service period.

11
12

Rebecca

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 4, 2016

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Bertsch,

Frank

defendants
completed

or

within

Piro,

a

Kelly

sufficient
Rule

4(m)’s