Dibartolomeo v. Jimenez et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/23/16 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 12/28/15 6 are ADOPTED in full; and Defendant Robert Himelblau is DISMISSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH ANTHONY DiBARTOLOMEO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2347 JAM KJN P
v.
ORDER
LINDA JIMINEZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 28, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 28, 2015, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Defendant Himelblau is dismissed.
4
DATED: March 23, 2016
5
/s/ John A. Mendez____________________________
6
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?