Gerlach v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department, et al.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/14/17 ordering that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHRISTIAN GERLACH,

12
13
14
15

No. 2: 15-cv-2376 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff is proceeding, without counsel, with this civil rights action brought pursuant to

19

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (ECF No. 4.)

20

A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal

21

service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that

22

a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-

23

three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has

24

failed to notify the Court of a current address.

25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice

26

for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

27

Dated: March 14, 2017
Ger2376.dis

28
1