Gerlach v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department, et al.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/14/17 ordering that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTIAN GERLACH, 12 13 14 15 No. 2: 15-cv-2376 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding, without counsel, with this civil rights action brought pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (ECF No. 4.) 20 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 21 service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that 22 a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty- 23 three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has 24 failed to notify the Court of a current address. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice 26 for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 27 Dated: March 14, 2017 Ger2376.dis 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?