Boulton et al v. U.S. Tax Lien Assoc.
Filing
62
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/5/2018 ORDERING: Within 60 days from the date of this Order the parties shall meet and confer regarding their discovery plan. All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed no later than 365 days from the date of this Order. All counsel are to designate in writing and serve upon all other parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial not later than 60 days after the close of discovery. Supplemental List due within 30 days after the designation of expert witnesses. The parties shall file dispositive motions no later than 180 days after the close of non-expert discovery. The parties are ordered to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than 30 days after receiving this Courts ruling(s) on the last filed dispositive motion(s). If the parties do not intend to file dispositive motions, the parties are ordered to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than 30 days after the close of the designation of supplemental expert witnesses. Any objections to Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order are due within 14 days from the date of this Order.(Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KERRY BOULTON, ET AL.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-02384-MCE-AC
v.
US TAX LIEN ASSOCIATION, LLC,
ET AL.,
SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
This action is assigned to the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. Pursuant to the
18
19
provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED:
21
I.
22
23
24
DISCOVERY
Within sixty (60) days1 of the date of this Order, the parties shall meet and confer
as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) regarding their discovery plan.
All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed no later
25
than three hundred sixty-five (365) days from the date of this Order. In this context,
26
“completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions
27
1
28
The parties shall refer to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) in computing the time periods
specified in this Order.
1
1
have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by
2
appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has
3
been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate
4
judge’s calendar in accordance with the Local Rules.2
5
II.
6
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing and serve upon all other parties the name,
7
address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial not later
8
than sixty (60) days after the close of discovery. The designation shall be accompanied
9
by a written report prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with
10
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B).
11
Within thirty (30) days after the designation of expert witnesses, any party may
12
designate a supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a
13
subject covered by an expert designated by an adverse party. The right to designate a
14
supplemental expert for rebuttal purposes only shall apply to a party who has not
15
previously disclosed an expert witness on the date set for expert witness disclosure by
16
this Order.
17
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
18
likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An
19
expert witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the
20
party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) good cause for the party’s failure to
21
designate the expert witness in accordance with this Order; (b) that the Court and
22
opposing counsel were promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the
23
witness was promptly made available for deposition.
24
For purposes of this Order, an “expert” is any person who may be used at trial to
25
present evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 702, 703, and 705, which include
26
both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
27
2
28
A copy of the current Local Rules is available at http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/rules/local-
rules/
2
1
opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues
2
in the case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a
3
testifying expert for the purposes of litigation).
4
Each party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient, retained, or
5
both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
6
express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts
7
must state in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such
8
persons.
9
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
10
an informed opinion, and given their bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to
11
give full and complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts
12
will not be permitted to testify at the trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or
13
opinion formed, after deposition taken subsequent to designation.
14
Counsel are instructed to complete all discovery of expert witnesses in a timely
15
manner in order to comply with the Court’s deadline for filing dispositive motions.
16
III.
17
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
The parties shall file dispositive motions no later than one hundred eighty (180)
18
days after the close of non-expert discovery. All papers should be filed in conformity
19
with the Local Rules. Absent leave of the Court, all issues the parties wish to resolve on
20
summary judgment must be raised together in one (1) motion or cross-motion. Should
21
the parties wish to file additional motions for summary judgment, they must seek leave of
22
the Court.
23
All purely legal issues are to be resolved in timely pretrial motions. When
24
appropriate, failure to comply with Local Rules 230 and 260, as modified by this Order,
25
may be deemed consent to the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion
26
summarily. With respect to motions for summary judgment, failure to comply with Local
27
Rules 230 and 260, as modified by this Order, may result in dismissal for failure to
28
prosecute (or failure to defend) pursuant to this Court’s inherent authority to control its
3
1
docket and or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Further, failure to timely oppose a
2
summary judgment motion3 may result in the granting of that motion if the movant shifts
3
the burden to the nonmovant to demonstrate that a genuine issue of material fact
4
remains for trial.
5
The Court places a page limit for points and authorities (exclusive of exhibits and
6
other supporting documentation) of twenty (20) pages on all initial moving papers, twenty
7
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. Sur-replies are viewed with
8
disfavor and will only be considered upon a showing of good cause. All requests for
9
page limit increases must be made in writing with a proposed order setting forth any and
10
all reasons for any increase in page limit at least seven (7) days prior to the filing of the
11
motion.
12
The parties are directed to the Court’s website for available hearing dates and
13
Judge England’s standard procedures. (www.caed.uscourts.gov – select “Judges” –
14
select “Judge England” – select “Standard Information”).
15
16
Citations to the Supreme Court Lexis database shall include parallel citations to
the Westlaw database.
17
The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device
18
designated to address the admissibility of evidence. The Court will look with disfavor
19
upon dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the
20
guise of motions in limine.
21
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
22
have been tendered to the Court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion
23
cut-off date may constitute waiver of such issue.
24
IV.
25
26
TRIAL SETTING
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than
thirty (30) days after receiving this Court’s ruling(s) on the last filed dispositive motion(s).
27
3
28
The Court urges any party that contemplates bringing a motion for summary judgment or who
must oppose a motion for summary judgment to review Local Rule 260.
4
1
If the parties do not intend to file dispositive motions, the parties are ordered to file a
2
Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than thirty (30) days after the close of the
3
designation of supplemental expert witnesses and the notice must include statements of
4
intent to forgo the filing of dispositive motions.
5
The parties are to set forth in their Notice of Trial Readiness, the appropriateness
6
of special procedures, whether this case is related to any other case(s) on file in the
7
Eastern District of California, the prospect for settlement, their estimated trial length, any
8
request for a jury, and their availability for trial. The parties’ Notice of Trial Readiness
9
Statement shall also estimate how many court days each party will require to present its
10
case, including opening statements and closing arguments. Plaintiff’s estimate shall also
11
include the time necessary for jury selection, and Defendant’s estimate shall include the
12
time necessary to finalize jury instructions and instruct the jury.
13
This Court is in session for jury selection, opening statements, presentation of
14
evidence, closing arguments, and instruction of the jury Monday through Wednesday,
15
only. Jury deliberations only are Monday through Friday if necessary.
16
After review of the parties’ Joint Notice of Trial Readiness, the Court will issue an
17
order that sets forth dates for a final pretrial conference and trial. The parties should be
18
prepared to submit discovery documents and trial exhibits electronically in PDF format.
19
V.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
20
If the parties agree to a settlement conference, a magistrate judge will be
21
randomly assigned to the case to preside over the settlement conference. If the parties
22
specifically request that the assigned District Judge or Magistrate Judge conduct the
23
settlement conference, the parties shall file the appropriate waiver of disqualification in
24
accordance with Local Rule 270(b). If the parties elect to participate in the Voluntary
25
Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP), a stipulation of election is required pursuant to
26
Local Rule 271. See, Attachments 2-1 and 2-2 of this Order.
27
28
In accordance with Local Rule 160, counsel are to immediately file a notice of
settlement or other disposition of this case.
5
1
VI.
2
MODIFICATION OF INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
3
Procedure, the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order shall not be modified except by leave of
4
court upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation
5
alone to modify the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order does not constitute good cause.
6
Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel will not
7
constitute good cause.
8
VII.
9
COURTESY COPIES
No party shall submit paper courtesy copies of pleadings or exhibits to the Court
10
unless expressly ordered to do so.
11
VIII.
12
OBJECTIONS TO INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
This Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order will become final without further order of the
13
Court unless objections are filed within fourteen (14) days of this Order.
14
Dated: September 5, 2018
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?