Williams v. Ponce
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/15/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CLARENCE D. WILLIAMS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-2385 KJM DB P
Petitioner,
v.
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
FELICIA PONCE,
Respondent.
16
17
A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the
18
postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which
19
requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More
20
than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and
21
petitioner has failed to notify the court of a current address.
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).
24
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
25
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
26
after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
27
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
28
Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within
1
1
fourteen days after service of the objections. Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections
2
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.
3
Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
Dated: October 15, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DLB:9
DB/prisoner-habeas/will2385.33a
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?