Reardon v. City of Chico et al
Filing
26
ORDER denying 13 Motion for Extension of Time signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/31/17. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SEAN PATRICK REARDON,
12
13
No. 2:15-cv-02410-MCE-CMK
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
15
CITY OF CHICO, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for 60-Day Extension of Time (ECF
19
No. 13). That Motion is DENIED without prejudice for failure to articulate the request
20
with reference to the appropriate standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).1
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 31, 2017
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance, the Court ordered this
matter submitted on the briefs. See E.D. Cal. Local R. 230(g).
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?