Reardon v. City of Chico et al

Filing 26

ORDER denying 13 Motion for Extension of Time signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/31/17. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN PATRICK REARDON, 12 13 No. 2:15-cv-02410-MCE-CMK Plaintiff, v. ORDER 14 15 CITY OF CHICO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for 60-Day Extension of Time (ECF 19 No. 13). That Motion is DENIED without prejudice for failure to articulate the request 20 with reference to the appropriate standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).1 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 31, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs. See E.D. Cal. Local R. 230(g). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?