Reardon v. City of Chico et al

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 6/30/2020, pursuant to 56 Stipulation, CONTINUING the cutoff date deadlines for Plaintiff's Opposition and Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition for 30 days in accordance with the original deadline dates. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Roger A. Colvin, Esq. (SBN 068773)
Alvarez-Glasman & Colvin
Attorneys at Law
13181 Crossroads Parkway North
Suite 400 – West Tower
City of Industry, CA 91746
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants City of Chico,
Michael A. Dunbaugh, Michael O’Brien,
Jack Ditty, Wayne Rockwell, and Jeffrey Kozak
ASHLEY R. AMERIO, ESQ. (SBN 230469)
MATTHEW D. ENGEBRETSON, ESQ. (SBN 231994)
AMERIO LAW FIRM P.C.
1651 Response Road, First Floor
Sacramento, CA 95815
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Sean Patrick Reardon

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF CHICO; MICHAEL A.
DUNBAUGH, individually and in his )
capacity as Interim Chief of the City )
)
of Chico Police Department;
)
MICHAEL O’BRIEN, individually )
and in his official capacity as Chico )
Police Captain/Incoming Police
)
Chief; JACK DITTY, individually
)
and in his official capacity as a Chico )
City Police Officer; WAYNE
)
ROCKWELL, individually and in his )
)
official capacity as a Chico City
Police Officer; JEFFREY KOZAK, )
)
individually and in his official
)
capacity as a Chico Police Officer;
)
and, DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
SEAN PATRICK REARDON

Case No.: 2:15-CV-02410-MCE-DMC
(Assigned to the Honorable District
Court Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.)
ORDER RE: COURT RULING ON (1)
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 42
U.S.C. § 1988; (2) REQUEST TO
CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND
REPLY CUTOFF DEADLINE DATES
PENDING EXECUTION OF
WAVIERS AND SETTLEMENT
AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

1

1

Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Court Ruling on

2

Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and Request to

3

continue Opposition and Reply Cutoff Deadline Dates pending execution of

4

Waivers and Settlement and Release Agreement by the Parties, the Court continues

5

the cutoff date deadlines for Plaintiff’s Opposition and Defendants’ Reply to

6

Plaintiff’s Opposition for thirty (30) dates in accordance with the original deadline

7

dates.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2020

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2