Fisher v. The People of Placer County
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/23/2016 VACATING the 2/22/2016 findings and recommendations 8 ; and petitioner shall file an amended petition within 30 days.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT HENRY FISHER,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:15-CV-2447-TLN-CMK-P
vs.
ORDER
PEOPLE OF PLACER COUNTY,
15
Respondent.
16
/
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of
18
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 12, 2016, the court dismissed
19
petitioner’s petition and directed petitioner to file an amended petition within 30 days naming the
20
proper respondent. Petitioner was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this
21
action. See Local Rule 110. As of February 22, 2016, petitioner had not complied. Specifically,
22
petitioner filed an amended petition which continues to name individuals over whom this court
23
does not have jurisdiction in a proceeding under § 2254. On February 22, 2016, the court issued
24
findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed.
25
///
26
///
1
1
In petitioner’s objections to the court’s findings and recommendations, petitioner
2
seeks an extension of the original deadline within which to file an amended petition. Good cause
3
appearing therefor, the February 22, 2016, findings and recommendations will be vacated and
4
petitioner will be granted an extension of time.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1.
The findings and recommendations issued on February 22, 2016, are
2.
Petitioner shall file an amended petition within 30 days of the date of this
7
vacated; and
8
9
order.
10
11
12
13
DATED: June 23, 2016
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?