Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Estate et al

Filing 144

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/23/2019 DENYING 143 Ex Parte Application. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL GONZALEZ, No. 2:15-cv-2448-TLN-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 ORDER v. KYLE THOMAS JONES, et al. Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s ex parte application for leave to file electronically. (ECF No. 143.) Generally, “any person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except with the 21 permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” See E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2). Plaintiff’s 22 application here only makes vague references to changes in plaintiff’s living and medical 23 circumstances. Additionally, given plaintiff’s history of voluminous filings, the court has grave 24 concerns about granting plaintiff electronic filing privileges. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s ex parte application for leave to 26 file electronically is DENIED. This order resolves ECF No. 143. 27 Dated: April 23, 2019 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?