Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Estate et al

Filing 163

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/27/2020 GRANTING defendants' 162 Motion for Extension of Time on the meet and confer requirement. Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit the name and contact information of his "substitute d attorney" to both the Court and to Defense Counsel no later than Thursday, 1/30/2020, at 2:00 PM. Regardless of whether Plaintiff has been successful at obtaining counsel, both he and any potential attorney are informed that the Court' s prior order compelling Plaintiff to sit for an oral deposition remains in full effect. Plaintiff shall sit for an oral deposition sometime prior to 2/6/2020. The hearing on Plaintiff's 152 Motion to Alter or Amend remains set for 2/13/2020, at 10:00 AM. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on Plaintiff at the email address listed in ECF No. 162 Exhibit 2, and is further directed to serve this order on Plaintiff by priority mail with delivery confirmation to Plaintiff's address. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL GONZALEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:15-cv-2448-TLN-KJN PS ORDER (ECF No. 162) DEPARTMENT (BUREAU) OF REAL ESTATE., et al. Defendants. 16 This case concerns Plaintiff’s allegations of wrongful revocation of his real estate license, 17 18 as against individual employees of the Department (“Bureau”) of Real Estate.1 (See ECF No. 136 19 at p. 2.) In December 2019, Defendant moved to compel Plaintiff, currently proceeding pro se, to 20 sit for an oral deposition. (ECF No. 153.) The Court granted the motion, ordered the parties to 21 confer by January 21, 2020, on potential dates, and ordered the deposition be held sometime prior 22 to February 6, 2020. (ECF No. 161.) On January 24, Defendants requested an extension of time on the date to confer. (ECF 23 24 No. 162.) Defense Counsel represented he emailed Plaintiff on January 15, proposing eight 25 potential dates for the deposition. (Id. at p. 6.) On January 21, Plaintiff responded by email, 26 stating he has “arranged to substitute an attorney in this matter and possible appeal.” (Id. at p. 9.) 27 28 1 Plaintiff represents herself in this action without the assistance of counsel; thus, this case proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 1 Plaintiff’s email states “[t]he attorney should be in contact with you shortly this week.” (Id.) 2 However, the letter does not provide any information about this attorney, save for a Cc: to “Mr. 3 Wright.” (Id.) Defense Counsel responded, informing Plaintiff that if he is in fact represented by 4 counsel, the rules bar him from communicating directly with Plaintiff. (Id. at p. 11.) Defense 5 Counsel requested Plaintiff provide the attorney’s contact information, but states that as of 6 January 24, neither Plaintiff nor any attorney has responded. (Id. at p. 3, ¶ 4.) 7 Given Plaintiff’s previous delays, the Court is skeptical of Plaintiff’s representations 8 concerning any potential attorney. (See ECF No. 158 at fn. 3.) However, the Court is sensitive–– 9 generally speaking––to matters of client representation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendants’ motion for extension of time on the meet and confer requirement (ECF 10 11 No. 162) is GRANTED; 12 2. Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit the name and contact information of his “substituted 13 attorney” to both the Court and to Defense Counsel no later than Thursday, January 14 30, 2020, at 2:00 p.m.; 15 3. Regardless of whether Plaintiff has been successful at obtaining counsel, both he and 16 any potential attorney are informed that the Court’s prior order compelling Plaintiff to 17 sit for an oral deposition (ECF No. 161) remains in full effect. Plaintiff shall sit for an 18 oral deposition sometime prior to February 6, 2020; 4. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend (ECF No. 152) remains set for 19 20 February 13, 2020, at 10:00 A.M., with a briefing schedule defined by Local Rule 230; 21 and 22 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on Plaintiff at the email address 23 listed in ECF No. 162 Exhibit 2, and is further directed to serve this order on Plaintiff 24 by priority mail with delivery confirmation to Plaintiff’s address. 25 Dated: January 27, 2020 26 27 gonz.2448 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?