Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Estate et al
Filing
95
ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/3/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 9/12/17 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (seeking to reinvigorate a dismissed state court preliminary injunction) is DENIED.(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL GONZALEZ,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-02448-GEB-GGH
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
DEPARTMENT (BUREAU) OF REAL
ESTATE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action.
18
On September 12, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
20
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 14 days of their issuance. ECF No. 93.
21
Neither party has filed objections to the magistrates Findings and Recommendations.
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,
23
this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, and the
24
magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, the court ADOPTS the findings and
25
recommendations.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
The findings and recommendations filed September 12, 2017 are adopted in full;
28
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (seeking to reinvigorate a
1
1
2
3
dismissed state court preliminary injunction) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 3, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?