Medley v. McNeilus Truck and Manufacturing, Inc.
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/28/17: Designation of Expert Witnesses extended from March 1, 2017 to April 3, 2017. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
ADAM M. AMBROZY, SBN 258237
LENAHAN, LEE, SLATER & PEARSE, LLP
1030 15TH Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 443-1030
Facsimile: (916) 443-0869
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff in Intervention
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA INC.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KENNETH MEDLEY,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
v.
McNEILUS TRUCK AND
MANUFACTURING INC., and DOES 1
through 100,
Case No. 2:15-cv-02453-TLN-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE
Judge: The Honorable Troy L. Nunley
Crt. Rm.: 2, 15th Floor
Defendants.
___________________________________
USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA INC.,
Intervenor
19
20
v.
21
McNEILUS TRUCK AND
MANUFACTURING INC., and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,
22
23
24
25
26
Defendants
Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for
disclosure of expert witnesses from March 1, 2017 to April 3, 2017, with the deadline to
27
designate supplemental list of expert witnesses to be set twenty days thereafter on May 4, 2017.
28
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE
1
This additional time is necessary because Waste Management witnesses continue to be deposed
2
and identified in response to Defendant McNeilus Truck and Manufacturing, Inc,’s FRCP
3
30(b)(6) deposition notice. Despite the parties’ diligence in coordinating depositions and
4
conducting discovery, the Parties wish to postpone the expert disclosures again to allow time to
5
6
process the evidence expected from Waste Management’s 30 (b)(6) deposition(s) before
7
confirming their selection of experts and submitting their reports. Further, the parties have
8
restarted settlement negiotations which will be hindered if the expert disclosure date is not
9
amended.
10
11
Trial in this matter is set for August 7, 2017, and thus the amended schedule would still
comport with the requirement that expert disclosures be made 90 days before trial. Fed. R. Civ.
12
13
14
15
16
P.26(a)(2)(D). The requested extension will not affect any of the other dates set in this case. The
parties have conferred and jointly agree to this extension.
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: 2/27/17
LENAHAN, LEE, SLATER & PEARSE, LLP
17
18
/s/
ADAM M. AMBROZY
Attorney for Intervenor- USA Waste of California, Inc.
19
20
SO STIPULATED.
21
22
Dated: 2/27/17
/s/
SPENCER J. PAHLKE
Attorney for Plaintiff- Kenneth Medley
(Agreed to terms on 2/27/17)
23
24
25
26
27
28
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: 2/27/17
/s/
ELIZABETH V. MCNULTY
Attorney for Defendant- McNeilus Trck and Manufacturing,
Inc.
(Agreed to terms on 2/27/17)
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE
1
2
PURSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: February 28, 2017
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?