Semick v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al.

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/15/16 GRANTING 13 Motion for Extension of time and plaintiff has 90 days from the date this order is served to file his amended complaint. The court notes, however, that filing an amended complaint should not require extensive research. An amended complaint should not include legal citations and need not contain unnecessarily detailed factual allegations. Absent good cause, the court is not inclined to grant further extensions of time.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TOBY M. SEMICK,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:15-cv-2462-JAM-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

19

U.S.C. § 1983. He requests a ninety-day extension of time to file his amended complaint

20

pursuant to the court’s August 18, 2016 order.

21

Plaintiff’s request (ECF No. 13) is granted and plaintiff has 90 days from the date this

22

order is served to file his amended complaint. The court notes, however, that filing an amended

23

complaint should not require extensive research. An amended complaint should not include legal

24

citations and need not contain unnecessarily detailed factual allegations. Absent good cause, the

25

court is not inclined to grant further extensions of time.

26
27
28

So ordered.
Dated: September 15, 2016.