Patel v. State of California

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/22/2016 GRANTING 21 Request to Continue the Status Conference; CONTINUING the Initial Scheduling Conference to 1/19/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 RICHARD M. ROGERS, #045843 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS 4 100 Bush Street, #1980 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/981-9788 Facsimile: 415/981-9798 Email: RogersRMR@yahoo.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 6 DEV PATEL 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DEV PATEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ) PUBLIC HEALTH AND DEPARTMENT OF ) TOXIC SUBSTANCES, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:15-cv-02471- KJN Case filed: Case reassigned: Trial date: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER ________________ Date: Time: Location: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 2:15-cv-02471--KJN -- REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER PATEL/ /15-2471 Patel 11/30/15 07/20/16 TBA v. State of California Order Approving Stip to Continue Status Conference 01/05/17 10:00 a.m. Courtroom 25, 8th floor 1 Plaintiff requests a continuance of the Status Conference from January 5, 2017, to 2 January 19, 2017, on the ground that Plaintiff’s counsel has a vacation scheduled from January 2 3 through 9, 2017. 4 Defense counsel has no objection to the continuance. 5 6 Respectfully submitted, Dated:____12/09/16_________________ LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS 7 8 By:__/s/ Richard M. Rogers__________________ RICHARD M. ROGERS Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 10 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. 12 Dated: December 22, 2016 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 2:15-cv-02471--KJN -- REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER PATEL/ /15-2471 Patel 1 v. State of California Order Approving Stip to Continue Status Conference

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?