Hall v. Jordan et al.

Filing 11

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/24/16 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TERRELL D. HALL,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-2474 GEB CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

G. JORDAN, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a civil detainee, commenced this action in November 2015. He has neither paid

18

the filing fee nor filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On January 14, 2016, plaintiff

19

was granted an additional thirty days to file an in forma pauperis application. The thirty day

20

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis application or responded

21

to the court’s order.

22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

28

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: February 24, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

2 / hall2474.fifp

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2