Goolsby v. Jenkins et al.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/12/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTWONE DORNELL GOOLSBY, SR.,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-2477 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

A. JENKINS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.

18

§ 636(c). By order filed October 21, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

19

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. On

20

December 7, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action

21

should not be dismissed without prejudice. Fourteen days from that date have now passed, and

22

plaintiff did not respond to the order to show cause, file an amended complaint, or otherwise

23

respond to the court’s orders. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is

24

dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

Dated: January 12, 2017

26
27
/gool2477.fsc

28
1