Goolsby v. Jenkins et al.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/12/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTWONE DORNELL GOOLSBY, SR., 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2477 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. JENKINS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. 18 § 636(c). By order filed October 21, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 19 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. On 20 December 7, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action 21 should not be dismissed without prejudice. Fourteen days from that date have now passed, and 22 plaintiff did not respond to the order to show cause, file an amended complaint, or otherwise 23 respond to the court’s orders. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is 24 dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 Dated: January 12, 2017 26 27 /gool2477.fsc 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?