Sariaslan v. Rackley et al.

Filing 37

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/17/18 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 36 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RAMIN SARIASLAN,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-2492-MCE-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

RONALD RACKLEY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. On June 19, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s

19

request for appointment of counsel. ECF No. 33. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of that order.

20

ECF No. 36.

21

Local Rule 303(f) provides that magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

22

erroneous or contrary to law.” the magistrate judge’s ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor

23

contrary to law, and Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 36) is DENIED.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 17, 2018