Sariaslan v. Rackley et al.

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/23/2020 ADOPTING 74 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAMIN SARIASLAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2492-MCE-EFB P v. ORDER RONALD RACKLEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 3, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Despite an extension of 23 time granted to plaintiff, neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2020, (ECF No. 74) are ADOPTED 27 28 in full; 1 1 2 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; and 3 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: October 23, 2020 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?