Witkin v. M. et al.
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/10/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff's appeal is frivolous and his ifp status on appeal should be revoked. (cc: Ninth Circuit, case no. 17-15567) (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL AARON WITKIN,
12
No. 2:15-cv-2493 KJM CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
KEVIN M., et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis, sought relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
18
§ 1983. Judgment was entered on September 27, 2016. On March 28, 2017, plaintiff filed a
19
notice of appeal. On March 31, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
20
referred this matter to the district court “for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma
21
pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad
22
faith.” (ECF No. 26.)
23
24
25
26
The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure provide as follows:
[A] party who has been permitted to proceed in an action in the
district court in forma pauperis . . . may proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis without further authorization unless . . . the district court
shall certify that the appeal is not taken in good faith or shall find
that the party is otherwise not entitled so to proceed . . . .
27
Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). After review of the record herein, the court determines that plaintiff’s
28
appeal is frivolous and his in forma pauperis status on appeal should be revoked. This filing
1
1
2
3
constitutes notification to plaintiff and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2/witk2493.ifp_appeal
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?