Plunk v. Tulare County et al.
Filing
4
ORDER for INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:15-cv-2500 CKD P) to Fresno (1:15-cv-1855 MJS P) signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/11/15. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHANNON PLUNK,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2500 CKD P
v.
ORDER
TULARE COUNTY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a California prisoner, has filed an action for violation of civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights took
19
place in Tulare County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court
20
for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
21
22
division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the
23
court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.
24
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
26
California sitting in Fresno; and
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
2
2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
3
4
5
Dated: December 11, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
2/md; plun2500.22
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?