Smith et al v. City of Stockton et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/9/2018; The Court has received an email correspondence 20 from the guardian ad litem, which has been filed on the Court's docket. This Court lacks jurisdiction over the administration of the underlying Special Needs Trust, which is under the ongoing jurisdiction of the Alameda County Probate Court. As such, all further correspondence regarding the administration of that trust will be summarily disregarded. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JAMES SMITH, by and through Guardian Ad Litem Teresa Smith; et al., 13 14 Plaintiffs, No. 2:15-cv-02511-MCE-AC ORDER v. 15 CITY OF STOCKTON; et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 The Court has received an email correspondence from the guardian ad litem, 19 which has been filed on the Court’s docket. ECF No. 20. This Court lacks jurisdiction 20 over the administration of the underlying Special Needs Trust, which is under the 21 ongoing jurisdiction of the Alameda County Probate Court. As such, all further 22 correspondence regarding the administration of that trust will be summarily disregarded. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 9, 2018 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?