Blight v. Manteca et al

Filing 117

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/1/2017 re: Filing Deadline for Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 JEFFREY A. SILVIA, ESQ. (121065) LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY A. SILVIA, APC 2800 West March Lane, Suite 410 Stockton, California 95219 Telephone: (209) 952-9396 Facsimile: (209) 952-9399 Email: jeffreysilvia@gmail.com SANJAY S. SCHMIDT (SBN 247475) LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 1388 Sutter Street, Suite 810 San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 563-8583 Facsimile: (415) 223-9717 Email: ss@sanjayschmidtlaw.com MICHAEL F. BABITZKE (SBN 50048) MICHAEL F. BABITZKE, INC., APC 6 South El Dorado St., Suite 305 Stockton, California 95202 Telephone: (209) 465-5722 Facsimile: (209) 465-0714 Email: mbabitzke@sbcglobal.net Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOANNE BLIGHT 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) CITY OF MANTECA, a Municipal ) Corporation, Manteca Police Department ) Detectives ARMANDO GARCIA, ) Individually, IAN OSBORN, Individually, ) and ARMEN AVAKIAN, Individually, ) Manteca Police Department Sergeants PAUL ) CARMONA and CHRIS S. MRAZ, in their ) Individual and Supervisory capacities, and ) DOES 1 THROUGH 60, Jointly and ) Severally, ) ) Defendants. ) ) JOANNE BLIGHT, Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC STPULATION RE: FILING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 27 28 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Stipulation Re: Filing Deadline; [Proposed] Order Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff JOANNE BLIGHT (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CITY OF MANTECA, ARMANDO GARCIA, IAN OSBORN, PAUL CARMONA, and CHRIS S. MRAZ, (“Defendants”) hereby respectfully stipulate that the deadline for filing Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, be regarded as the filing deadline that would apply under Local Rule 230(c) (09/04/17), if September 4, 2017 were not a holiday - in other words, that the filing deadline be regarded as September 4, 2017, instead of September 1, 2017. Good cause exists for this Stipulation. This case involves a voluminous amount of documents and evidence, including sixteen (16) depositions, and a significant amount of evidence 10 that requires sensitive treatment of materials that are subject to the Attorneys’ Eyes Only 11 Protective Order. Plaintiff’s counsel had allocated time to respond to the Summary Judgment 12 Motion based upon the belief that the Opposition was due on September 4, 2017. Plaintiff’s 13 14 15 16 counsel had allocated additional time on Monday September 4, 2017 (instead of taking the day off), in order to make sure that information related to the CI was appropriately redacted and that counsel filed everything in accordance with the protective Order. In addition, Mr. Babitzke, who had been assigned specific tasks to perform in responding 17 to the Motion, had to undergo orthopedic surgery on August 15, 2017. Mr. Babitzke’s doctor 18 instructed him to not return to work until August 30, 2017. Consequently, he was unable to 19 complete the tasks assigned to him and, thus, the time that would be available under what was 20 understood to be the filing date under LR 230(c) is needed. 21 On August 29, 2017, Jeffrey A., Silvia, one of the attorneys for Plaintiff, called defense 22 counsel, Kevin P. Allen, and discussed the issues addressed herein. Mr. Allen told Mr. Silvia that 23 he believed that Plaintiff’s response was due on September 4, 2017 as well, and therefore was 24 willing to enter into this Stipulation. After Plaintiff’s counsel broached this issue with defense 25 counsel, Defendants researched it, and no longer believe the filing deadline is 09/04/17. 26 27 Based on the foregoing circumstances, by and through their respective counsel of record, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following: 28 Stipulation Re: Filing Deadline; [Proposed] Order Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. That the deadline for filing Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, be regarded as the filing deadline that would apply under Local Rule 230(c) (09/04/17), if September 4, 2017 were not a holiday – in other words, that the filing deadline be regarded as September 4, 2017; however, 2. Plaintiff’s counsel agrees to email an electronic copy of Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition by 12:00 p.m. (noon), on 09/04/17, to opposing counsel, Kevin Allen, Esq., with the final, redacted version to be filed by the normal filing deadline on that date. 9 10 Respectfully submitted, Dated: August 31, 2017 LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 11 By: 12 13 /s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt SANJAY S. SCHMIDT Attorneys for Plaintiff JOANNE BLIGHT 14 15 Dated: August 31, 2017 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 16 17 18 19 20 By: /s/ Kevin P. Allen DALE L. ALLEN, JR. KEVIN P. ALLEN Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MANTECA, ARMANDO GARCIA, IAN OSBORN, PAUL CARMONA and CHRIS S. MRAZ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation Re: Filing Deadline; [Proposed] Order Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC 3 1 PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, and 2 the deadline for filing Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary 3 4 Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, shall be regarded as the filing deadline that would apply under Local Rule 230(c) (09/04/17), if September 4, 2017 were not a holiday – 5 6 in other words, that the filing deadline be regarded as September 4, 2017. However, Plaintiff 7 shall email an electronic copy of her Response in Opposition by 12:00 p.m. (noon), on 09/04/17, 8 to opposing counsel, Kevin Allen, Esq., with the final, redacted version to be filed by the normal 9 filing deadline on that date. 10 Dated: September 1, 2017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation Re: Filing Deadline; [Proposed] Order Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?