Blight v. Manteca et al

Filing 131

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/7/2017 REPLACING 118 Opposition to Motion with 128 Opposition to Motion; ORDERING that 118 Opposition to Motion no longer be accessible on PACER. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 JEFFREY A. SILVIA, ESQ. (121065) LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY A. SILVIA, APC 2800 West March Lane, Suite 410 Stockton, California 95219 Telephone: (209) 952-9396 Facsimile: (209) 952-9399 Email: jeffreysilvia@gmail.com SANJAY S. SCHMIDT (SBN 247475) LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 1388 Sutter Street, Suite 810 San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 563-8583 Facsimile: (415) 223-9717 Email: ss@sanjayschmidtlaw.com MICHAEL F. BABITZKE (SBN 50048) MICHAEL F. BABITZKE, INC., APC 6 South El Dorado St., Suite 305 Stockton, California 95202 Telephone: (209) 465-5722 Facsimile: (209) 465-0714 Email: mbabitzke@sbcglobal.net Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOANNE BLIGHT 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION JOANNE BLIGHT, vs. Plaintiff, CITY OF MANTECA, a Municipal Corporation, Manteca Police Department Detectives ARMANDO GARCIA, Individually, IAN OSBORN, Individually, and ARMEN AVAKIAN, Individually, Manteca Police Department Sergeants PAUL CARMONA and CHRIS S. MRAZ, in their Individual and Supervisory capacities, and DOES 1 THROUGH 60, Jointly and Severally, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC NOTICE OF ERRONEOUS FILING (DOCKET NUMBER 118) & REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION & DELETION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendants. 28 Plaintiff’s Notice of Erroneous Filing (Re: Dkt. 118) & Request for Substitution & Removal; [Proposed] Order Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 3 Plaintiff, JOANNE BLIGHT, hereby respectfully submits this Notice of Erroneous Filing and Request for Substitution. After 4 reviewing the document filed as Plaintiff’s 5 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants’ 6 Motion 7 Adjudication (Dkt. No. 118), the undersigned realized that the 8 9 10 for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary document that had been filed was filed in error. The document filed was not the correct, most up to date version, had formatting errors in certain portions of the footer, and lacked the table of contents. The undersigned apologizes for this error, 11 which occurred as a result of a formatting error that apparently 12 occurred when the document was being finalized; it resulted in 13 the 14 undersigned’s 15 overwrote 16 rectified, however, and the correct version is being filed. version the of staff the under correct, merged the final file same being name, version. The saved which by the apparently problem has been Accordingly, in light of the importance that the Court, the 17 18 wrong Court’s staff, Defendants’ counsel, and all other interested parties have the correct version, and that the electronic record 19 20 of this action contain the correct version, Plaintiff respectfully requests that Docket No. 118 be substituted with 21 Docket No. 128, and that Docket No. 118 be removed from PACER and 22 no longer accessible. 23 The undersigned apologizes for this error. 24 Dated: September 6, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT /s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt By: SANJAY S. SCHMIDT Attorneys for Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Notice of Erroneous Filing (Re: Dkt. 118) & Request for Substitution & Removal; [Proposed] Order Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC 1 JOANNE BLIGHT 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 Good cause appearing therefor, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Docket No. 118 be replaced with 5 6 7 8 Docket No. 128, and that Docket No. 118 be removed from PACER and no longer accessible. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 7, 2017 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff’s Notice of Erroneous Filing (Re: Dkt. 118) & Request for Substitution & Removal; [Proposed] Order Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?