Blight v. Manteca et al
Filing
131
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/7/2017 REPLACING 118 Opposition to Motion with 128 Opposition to Motion; ORDERING that 118 Opposition to Motion no longer be accessible on PACER. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
JEFFREY A. SILVIA, ESQ. (121065)
LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY A. SILVIA, APC
2800 West March Lane, Suite 410
Stockton, California 95219
Telephone: (209) 952-9396
Facsimile: (209) 952-9399
Email: jeffreysilvia@gmail.com
SANJAY S. SCHMIDT (SBN 247475)
LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 810
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: (415) 563-8583
Facsimile: (415) 223-9717
Email: ss@sanjayschmidtlaw.com
MICHAEL F. BABITZKE (SBN 50048)
MICHAEL F. BABITZKE, INC., APC
6 South El Dorado St., Suite 305
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: (209) 465-5722
Facsimile: (209) 465-0714
Email: mbabitzke@sbcglobal.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
JOANNE BLIGHT
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
JOANNE BLIGHT,
vs.
Plaintiff,
CITY OF MANTECA, a Municipal
Corporation, Manteca Police
Department Detectives ARMANDO
GARCIA, Individually, IAN
OSBORN, Individually, and ARMEN
AVAKIAN, Individually, Manteca
Police Department Sergeants
PAUL CARMONA and CHRIS S. MRAZ,
in their Individual and
Supervisory capacities, and
DOES 1 THROUGH 60, Jointly and
Severally,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC
NOTICE OF ERRONEOUS FILING
(DOCKET NUMBER 118) & REQUEST
FOR SUBSTITUTION & DELETION;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendants.
28
Plaintiff’s Notice of Erroneous Filing (Re: Dkt. 118) & Request for Substitution & Removal;
[Proposed] Order
Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC
1
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
2
3
Plaintiff, JOANNE BLIGHT, hereby respectfully submits this
Notice of Erroneous Filing and Request for Substitution.
After
4
reviewing
the
document
filed
as
Plaintiff’s
5
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants’
6
Motion
7
Adjudication (Dkt. No. 118), the undersigned realized that the
8
9
10
for
Summary
Judgment
or,
in
the
Alternative,
Summary
document that had been filed was filed in error. The document
filed
was
not
the
correct,
most
up
to
date
version,
had
formatting errors in certain portions of the footer, and lacked
the table of contents. The undersigned apologizes for this error,
11
which occurred as a result of a formatting error that apparently
12
occurred when the document was being finalized; it resulted in
13
the
14
undersigned’s
15
overwrote
16
rectified, however, and the correct version is being filed.
version
the
of
staff
the
under
correct,
merged
the
final
file
same
being
name,
version.
The
saved
which
by
the
apparently
problem
has
been
Accordingly, in light of the importance that the Court, the
17
18
wrong
Court’s
staff,
Defendants’
counsel,
and
all
other
interested
parties have the correct version, and that the electronic record
19
20
of
this
action
contain
the
correct
version,
Plaintiff
respectfully requests that Docket No. 118 be substituted with
21
Docket No. 128, and that Docket No. 118 be removed from PACER and
22
no longer accessible.
23
The undersigned apologizes for this error.
24
Dated: September 6, 2017 Respectfully Submitted,
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT
/s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt
By: SANJAY S. SCHMIDT
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Plaintiff’s Notice of Erroneous Filing (Re: Dkt. 118) & Request for Substitution & Removal;
[Proposed] Order
Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC
1
JOANNE BLIGHT
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
3
Good cause appearing therefor,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Docket No. 118 be replaced with
5
6
7
8
Docket No. 128, and that Docket No. 118 be removed from PACER and
no longer accessible.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 7, 2017
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff’s Notice of Erroneous Filing (Re: Dkt. 118) & Request for Substitution & Removal;
[Proposed] Order
Case No. 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?