Blight v. Manteca et al

Filing 37

PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/19/16; any provision in the parties' 36 Stipulation that is in conflict with anything in this order is DISAPPROVED. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOANNE BLIGHT,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-2513 WBS AC

v.

PROTECTIVE ORDER

CITY OF MANTECA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order Re: Sealed

17
18

Affidavit (ECF No. 36), is APPROVED and INCORPORATED herein.1

19

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

20

1. With respect to motions regarding any disputes concerning this protective order which

21

the parties cannot informally resolve, the parties shall follow the procedures outlined in E.D. Cal.

22

R. (“Local Rule”) 251. Absent a showing of good cause, the court will not hear discovery

23

disputes on an ex parte basis or on shortened time.
2. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(f), the court will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement

24
25

of the terms of this Protective Order after the action is terminated.

26

////

27
28

1

The Stipulation replaces and corrects ECF No. 33, which is NOT APPROVED.
1

1

3. Any provision in the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 36) that is in conflict with anything

2

in this order is hereby DISAPPROVED.

3

DATED: December 19, 2016

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2