Blight v. Manteca et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/21/17 ORDERING that defendants: Ranch Johnson, Mike Keener, Armen Avakian and Kirk Doty are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MANTECA, ARMANDO GARCIA, RANCH JOHNSON, KIRK DOTY, MIKE KEENER, IAN OSBORN, ARMEN AVAKIAN, PAUL CARMONA and CHRIS S. MRAZ 9 10 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94104 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 8 DALE L. ALLEN, JR., State Bar No. 145279 dallen@aghwlaw.com KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290 kallen@aghwlaw.com ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 697-2000 Facsimile: (415) 813-2045 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Case No.: 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC JOANNE BLIGHT, Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS v. CITY OF MANTECA, a Municipal Corporation, Manteca Police Department Detectives ARMANDO GARCIA, Individually, RANCH JOHNSON, Individually, KIRK DOTY, Individually, MIKE KEENER, Individually, IAN OSBORN, Individually, and ARMEN AVAKIAN, Individually, Manteca Police Department Sergeants PAUL CARMONA and CHRIS S. MRAZ, in their Individual and Supervisory capacities, and DOES 1 THROUGH 60, Jointly and Severally, Defendants. 25 26 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY 27 STIPULATED among the parties, through their respective counsel, that the following defendants 28 be dismissed without prejudice. 1 157973.1 DISMISSAL 2:15-CV-02513-WBS-AC 1 2 3 4 5 1. RANCH JOHNSON; 2. KIRK DOTY; 3. MIKE KEENER; and 4. ARMEN AVAKIAN The parties further stipulate to the following: 6 7 1. That the dismissed Defendants named above and the Plaintiff will each bear their own fees and costs solely as to the dismissed Defendants. In other words, each side 9 bears its own fees and costs (including attorneys’ fees) in the above-captioned 10 lawsuit relating to this dismissal of RANCH JOHNSON, KIRK DOTY, MIKE 11 KEENER, and ARMEN AVAKIAN only. However, this stipulated dismissal and 12 this provision of the instant Stipulation shall not be construed in any future 13 proceeding as a waiver of the prevailing party’s right under 42 U.SC. 1988(b) or 14 California Civil Code 52.1(h) (or any other attorney fee provision alleged in this 15 lawsuit) to recover attorney’s fees for time expended in the litigation in matters 16 related to the dismissed Defendants, such as written discovery, depositions, and 17 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94104 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 8 other matters, to the extent it is otherwise recoverable. 18 2. That Defendants’ counsel of record, ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & 19 WERTH, represent they are authorized to and will accept service of trial 20 subpoenas in the above-captioned lawsuit on behalf of RANCH JOHNSON, KIRK 21 DOTY, MIKE KEENER, and ARMEN AVAKIAN. 22 23 Respectfully Submitted, Dated: February 21, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 24 25 By: 26 27 /s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt SANJAY S. SCHMIDT Attorneys for Plaintiff JOANNE BLIGHT 28 2 157973.1 DISMISSAL 2:15-CV-02513-WBS-AC 1 Dated: February 21, 2017 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 6 7 /s/ Kevin P. Allen DALE L. ALLEN, JR. KEVIN P. ALLEN Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MANTECA, ARMANDO GARCIA, RANCH JOHNSON, KIRK DOTY, MIKE KEENER, IAN OSBORN, ARMEN AVAKIAN, PAUL CARMONA and CHRIS S. MRAZ 9 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION SET FORTH ABOVE, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94104 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 8 11 DATED: February 21, 2017 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 157973.1 DISMISSAL 2:15-CV-02513-WBS-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?