Blight v. Manteca et al
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/21/17 ORDERING that defendants: Ranch Johnson, Mike Keener, Armen Avakian and Kirk Doty are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF MANTECA, ARMANDO GARCIA, RANCH
JOHNSON, KIRK DOTY, MIKE KEENER, IAN
OSBORN, ARMEN AVAKIAN, PAUL CARMONA and
CHRIS S. MRAZ
9
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
DALE L. ALLEN, JR., State Bar No. 145279
dallen@aghwlaw.com
KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290
kallen@aghwlaw.com
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 697-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 813-2045
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Case No.: 2:15-cv-02513-WBS-AC
JOANNE BLIGHT,
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS
v.
CITY OF MANTECA, a Municipal
Corporation, Manteca Police Department
Detectives ARMANDO GARCIA,
Individually, RANCH JOHNSON,
Individually, KIRK DOTY, Individually,
MIKE KEENER, Individually, IAN
OSBORN, Individually, and ARMEN
AVAKIAN, Individually, Manteca Police
Department Sergeants PAUL CARMONA
and CHRIS S. MRAZ, in their Individual
and Supervisory capacities, and DOES 1
THROUGH 60, Jointly and Severally,
Defendants.
25
26
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY
27
STIPULATED among the parties, through their respective counsel, that the following defendants
28
be dismissed without prejudice.
1
157973.1
DISMISSAL
2:15-CV-02513-WBS-AC
1
2
3
4
5
1.
RANCH JOHNSON;
2.
KIRK DOTY;
3.
MIKE KEENER; and
4.
ARMEN AVAKIAN
The parties further stipulate to the following:
6
7
1.
That the dismissed Defendants named above and the Plaintiff will each bear their
own fees and costs solely as to the dismissed Defendants. In other words, each side
9
bears its own fees and costs (including attorneys’ fees) in the above-captioned
10
lawsuit relating to this dismissal of RANCH JOHNSON, KIRK DOTY, MIKE
11
KEENER, and ARMEN AVAKIAN only. However, this stipulated dismissal and
12
this provision of the instant Stipulation shall not be construed in any future
13
proceeding as a waiver of the prevailing party’s right under 42 U.SC. 1988(b) or
14
California Civil Code 52.1(h) (or any other attorney fee provision alleged in this
15
lawsuit) to recover attorney’s fees for time expended in the litigation in matters
16
related to the dismissed Defendants, such as written discovery, depositions, and
17
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
other matters, to the extent it is otherwise recoverable.
18
2.
That Defendants’ counsel of record, ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD &
19
WERTH, represent they are authorized to and will accept service of trial
20
subpoenas in the above-captioned lawsuit on behalf of RANCH JOHNSON, KIRK
21
DOTY, MIKE KEENER, and ARMEN AVAKIAN.
22
23
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: February 21, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT
24
25
By:
26
27
/s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt
SANJAY S. SCHMIDT
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOANNE BLIGHT
28
2
157973.1
DISMISSAL
2:15-CV-02513-WBS-AC
1
Dated: February 21, 2017
ALLEN, GLAESSNER,
HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
6
7
/s/ Kevin P. Allen
DALE L. ALLEN, JR.
KEVIN P. ALLEN
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF MANTECA, ARMANDO
GARCIA, RANCH JOHNSON, KIRK DOTY,
MIKE KEENER, IAN OSBORN, ARMEN
AVAKIAN, PAUL CARMONA and CHRIS
S. MRAZ
9
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION SET FORTH ABOVE, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
11
DATED: February 21, 2017
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
157973.1
DISMISSAL
2:15-CV-02513-WBS-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?