Womack v. Mahoney et al.
Filing
13
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/2/2018 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations in full, DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP, and DIRECTING Plaintiff to pay, within 30 days, the entire $400.00 in required fees. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RODNEY JEROME WOMACK,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-02517-TLN-AC-P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
T. MAHONEY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On October 13, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein,
21
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff
23
was granted an extension of time up to and including November 27, 2017 to file objections to the
24
findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff has not filed objections.
25
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
27
ORDERED that:
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 13, 2017 (ECF No. 10), are adopted
1
1
2
in full;
2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied because he has
3
accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and has not demonstrated that he is under
4
imminent danger of serious physical injury; and
5
6
3. Plaintiff has thirty days to pay the entire $400.00 in required fees or face dismissal of
the case.
7
8
Dated: January 2, 2018
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?