Gomez v. Braun et al.

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/14/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's 41 request for production of documents will be placed in the court file and DISREGARDED. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

NEXIS RENE GOMEZ,

10
11
12

No. 2:15-cv-2523 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

D. BRAUN, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Plaintiff has filed a document entitled, “request for production of documents.” Plaintiff is

16

informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither discovery

17

requests served on an opposing party nor that party’s responses should be filed until such time as

18

a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the

19

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with

20

the court unless, and until, they are at issue.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for production of

22

documents (ECF No. 41) will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned

23

that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may

24

result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be

25

dismissed.

26

Dated: June 14, 2017

27
gome2523.411

28