Gomez v. Braun et al.
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/14/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's 41 request for production of documents will be placed in the court file and DISREGARDED. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NEXIS RENE GOMEZ,
No. 2:15-cv-2523 KJN P
D. BRAUN, et al.,
Plaintiff has filed a document entitled, “request for production of documents.” Plaintiff is
informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither discovery
requests served on an opposing party nor that party’s responses should be filed until such time as
a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with
the court unless, and until, they are at issue.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for production of
documents (ECF No. 41) will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned
that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may
result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be
Dated: June 14, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?