Walker v. Tisserand

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/29/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES E. WALKER,

12

No. 2:15-cv-2524 AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

T. TISSERAND,

15

ORDER

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

17
18

U.S.C. § 1983 and has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all

19

purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). ECF No. 4. A recent court order

20

was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that

21

plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in

22

propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed

23

since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the court

24

of a current address.

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice

2

for failure to prosecute. See L.R. 183(b).

3

DATED: June 29, 2017

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2