Nobles v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/11/2016 ORDERING that time is EXTENDED for 30 days to 11/10/2016, for Plaintiff to file the Reply Brief. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Forslund Law, LLC CSBN 154575 P.O. Box 4476 Sunriver, OR 97707 4 5 6 Telephone: Email: 541-419-0074 jaf@forslundlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DERRICK NOBLES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Comm’r of Social Security, ) ) Defendant, ) ) ____________________________________) No. 2:15-cv-02525-DB STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend 19 20 the time 30 days to November 10, 2016, for Plaintiff to file the Reply Brief, in accordance with the 21 Court’s Scheduling Order. This is the first extension of time Plaintiff has requested for the filing of 22 the Reply Brief and is requested because Plaintiff’s counsel is experiencing a significant backlog in 23 her workload. The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order be modified accordingly. 24 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 3 Date: October 11, 2016 4 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney at Law 5 /s/Jacqueline A. Forslund JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND 6 7 Attorney for Plaintiff 8 9 10 Date: October 10, 2016 11 12 PHILIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney DEBORAH STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 13 /s/*Esther Kim ESTHER KIM Special Assistant United States Attorney *By email authorization 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant 17 18 ORDER 19 20 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: October 11, 2016 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLB:6 DLB1\orders.soc sec\nobles2525.stip.eot.ord

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?