Scally v. Ferrara et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/24/18 ORDERING the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 29 ) is DENIED; the Magistrate Judge's 2/3/17, order is AFFIRMED; and No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHEN EARL SCALLY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-CV-2528-MCE-CMK-P v. ORDER THOMAS A. FERRARA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 29) of the 19 Magistrate Judge’s February 3, 2017, order denying counsel (Doc. 24). Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s 20 21 order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire 22 file, the court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was clearly 23 erroneous or contrary to law. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that; 2 1. The motion for reconsideration (Doc. 29) is denied; 3 2. The Magistrate Judge’s February 3, 2017, order is affirmed; and 4 3. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2018 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?