Hawk v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/18/2016 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the 7 order of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff is GRANTED fourteen days from the date of this order to file his amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint within fourteen days may result in dismissal. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHAWN HAWK,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:15-cv-2529 KJM CKD P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DERPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

On January 14, 2016, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for

19

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s December 30, 2015 order dismissing plaintiff’s

20

complaint with leave to amend. Under E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall

21

be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court

22

finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

24

magistrate judge filed December 30, 2015, is affirmed. Plaintiff is granted fourteen days from the

25

date of this order to file his amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint within

26

fourteen days may result in dismissal.

27

DATED: March 18, 2016

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1