Donney v. Beard et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/3/16 ORDERING that the time for Defendants to file their Reply tothe Motion to Dismiss be extended to February 5, 2016.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
MICHELLE L. ANGUS, State Bar No. 210031
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Beard and Duffy

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11
12

Case No. 2:15-cv-2530-JAM-EFB P
KENNETH DONNEY,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS;
PROPOSED ORDER

13
14

v.

15
16

Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Defendants. Judge:

DR. JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,

17

February 10, 2016
10:00 a.m.
8
The Hon. Edmund F. Brennan

18
The parties request a two day extension of time to February 5, 2016, for Defendants to file

19
20

their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Defendants filed their

21

Motion to Dismiss on January 8, 2016. (ECF No. 8.) The motion is scheduled to be heard at

22

10:00 a.m. on February 10, 2016, before the Honorable Edward F. Brennan. Plaintiff’s counsel

23

timely filed his opposition on January 27, 2016. Defendants’ Reply is due to be filed on February

24

3, 2016.
Counsel for Defendants is currently out-of-state for the funeral of a family member, and

25
26

will not be back in the office until February 1, 2016. Defendants’ counsel had her office contact

27

Plaintiff’s counsel requesting the stipulation for a two day extension of time which was agreed to.

28

///
1
Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to File a Reply to Motion to Dismiss (2:15-cv-2530-JAM-EFB P)

1

STIPULATION

2

Under Civil Local Rule 144 and Fed. Rule Civ. P. 6, the parties, by and through their

3

respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that the time for Defendants to file their Reply to

4

the Motion to Dismiss be extended to February 5, 2016.

5
6

SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 29, 2016

By: /s/ Alfred Vargas___________________
ALFRED VARGAS
LAW OFFICES OF ALFRED VARGAS
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: January 29, 2016

By: /s/ Monica N. Anderson______________
MONICA N. ANDERSON
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED

14

Dated: February 3, 2016

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to File a Reply to Motion to Dismiss (2:15-cv-2530-JAM-EFB P)