Vargas et al v. County of Yolo et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/29/2016 ORDERING that the motion to compel defendants to produce transcripts of deposition testimony of defendant Prieto taken in prior unrelated litigation is DENIED. Upon payment of proper f ees to the court reporter who took the depositions of defendant Prieto, the court reporter is hereby authorized to release said transcripts to counsel for plaintiff. The transcripts shall be used solely for purposes of this litigation. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIA VARGAS, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2537 TLN CKD v. ORDER COUNTY OF YOLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 An informal discovery conference was held on September 28, 2016. Mark Merin 18 appeared telephonically for plaintiffs. Amie McTavish appeared telephonically for defendants. 19 Upon review of the joint letter brief and upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause 20 appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: The motion to compel defendants to produce transcripts of deposition testimony of 21 22 defendant Prieto taken in prior unrelated litigation is denied. 23 Upon payment of proper fees to the court reporter who took the depositions of defendant 24 Prieto, the court reporter is hereby authorized to release said transcripts to counsel for plaintiff.1 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 28 1 By this order, the undersigned makes no ruling on the admissibility or relevance of the prior deposition testimony to the issues raised in the instant litigation. 1 1 The transcripts shall be used solely for purposes of this litigation. 2 Dated: September 29, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 4 vargas2537.infdisc.oah 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?