Vargas et al v. County of Yolo et al
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/29/2016 ORDERING that the motion to compel defendants to produce transcripts of deposition testimony of defendant Prieto taken in prior unrelated litigation is DENIED. Upon payment of proper f ees to the court reporter who took the depositions of defendant Prieto, the court reporter is hereby authorized to release said transcripts to counsel for plaintiff. The transcripts shall be used solely for purposes of this litigation. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARIA VARGAS, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2537 TLN CKD
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF YOLO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
An informal discovery conference was held on September 28, 2016. Mark Merin
18
appeared telephonically for plaintiffs. Amie McTavish appeared telephonically for defendants.
19
Upon review of the joint letter brief and upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause
20
appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
The motion to compel defendants to produce transcripts of deposition testimony of
21
22
defendant Prieto taken in prior unrelated litigation is denied.
23
Upon payment of proper fees to the court reporter who took the depositions of defendant
24
Prieto, the court reporter is hereby authorized to release said transcripts to counsel for plaintiff.1
25
/////
26
/////
27
28
1
By this order, the undersigned makes no ruling on the admissibility or relevance of the prior
deposition testimony to the issues raised in the instant litigation.
1
1
The transcripts shall be used solely for purposes of this litigation.
2
Dated: September 29, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
4
5
6
4 vargas2537.infdisc.oah
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?