Vargas et al v. County of Yolo et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/12/2018 ORDERING that plaintiff Jorge Vargas' False Arrest claims against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff Arnulfo Bermudez's False Arrest claims against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear its/his own attorney fees and costs incurred in regard to the prosecution and defense of the above-dismissed claims. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BRUCE A. KILDAY (S.B. 66415) Email: bkilday@akk-law.com AMIE McTAVISH (S.B. 242372) Email: amctavish@akk-law.com ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP Attorneys at Law 601 University Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 564-6100 Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF YOLO (also sued herein as YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE), EDWARD PRIETO, HECTOR BAUTISTA, REIKO MATSUMURA and GARY HALLENBECK 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MARIA VARGAS, MARTIN VARGAS, ANGELICA VARGAS, AUGUSTIN VARGAS, ARNULFO BERMUDEZ, JORGE VARGAS and PEDRO GARCIA, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) COUNTY OF YOLO, YOLO COUNTY ) SHERIFF’S OFFICE, EDWARD PRIETO, ) HECTOR BAUTISTA, REIKO ) MATSUMURA, GARY HALLENBECK and ) DOES 1 TO 50, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 2:15-cv-02537-TLN-CKD STIPULATION TO DISMISS VARIOUS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS; ORDER 24 25 TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES, AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 26 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiffs MARIA VARGAS, 27 MARTIN 28 BERMUDEZ, JORGE VARGAS and PEDRO GARCIA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants VARGAS, ANGELICA VARGAS, AUGUSTIN VARGAS, ARNULFO -1STIPULATION TO DISMISS VARIOUS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS; ORDER 1 COUNTY OF YOLO (also sued herein as YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE), EDWARD 2 PRIETO, HECTOR BAUTISTA, REIKO MATSUMURA and GARY HALLENBECK 3 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, 4 hereby stipulate as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1) Plaintiff Jorge Vargas’ False Arrest claims against all Defendants are dismissed with prejudice; and 2) Plaintiff Arnulfo Bermudez’s False Arrest claims against all Defendants are dismissed with prejudice; Each party shall bear its/his own attorney fees and costs incurred in regard to the prosecution and defense of the above-dismissed claims. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 13 Dated: February 7, 2018 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP /s/ Amie McTavish By:_________________________________ AMIE McTAVISH BRUCE A. KILDAY Attorneys for Defendants 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: February 7, 2018 LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN /s/ Mark E. Merin (as authorized on 2.7.18) By:_________________________________ MARK E. MERIN PAUL MASUHARA Attorneys for Plaintiffs 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO DISMISS VARIOUS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS; ORDER 1 ORDER 2 Having reviewed the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff Jorge Vargas’ False Arrest claims against Defendants are dismissed with 1) prejudice; and Plaintiff Arnulfo Bermudez’s False Arrest claims against Defendants are dismissed 2) with prejudice; Each party shall bear its/his own attorney fees and costs incurred in regard to the prosecution and defense of the above-dismissed claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 2/12/2018 12 13 14 15 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION TO DISMISS VARIOUS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS; ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?