Bonilla-Chirinos, et al. v. City of West Sacramento, et al.

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER Modifying the Pretrial Scheduling Order signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/16/16. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 2/23/2017, Rebuttal Expert Disclosure due 3/23/2017, Discovery due by 4/21/2017, Motions to be filed by 6/13/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/25/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Joint Pretrial Statements to be filed by 9/18/2017. Trial set for 11/14/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 AMIE McTAVISH (SB No. 242371) Email: amctavish@akk-law.com SEAN D. O’DOWD (SB No. 296320) Email: sodowd@akk-law.com ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP Attorneys at Law 601 University Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 564-6100 6 Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 7 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and KENNETH FELLOWS 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 GUILLERMO BONILLA-CHIRINOS, SANDRA HERNANDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIANS AD LITEM OF J B, A MINOR ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, ) KENNETH FELLOWS (BADGE #151) AND ) DOES 1 THROUGH 99, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) Case No.: 2:15-cv-02564-WBS-EFB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 21 COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to the 22 approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following modifications to 23 this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order of April 12, 2016 (Court’s Docket No. 11), regarding the 24 scheduling of this case: 25  moved to February 23, 2017; 26 27 28 That the expert witness disclosure cut-off date currently set for November 23, 2016 be  That the rebuttal expert witness disclosure currently set for December 23, 2016 be moved to March 23, 2017; -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER  1 2 That the discovery deadline currently set for January 23, 2017 be moved to April 21, 2017;  3 4 That the deadline to file Motions currently set for March 13, 2017 be moved to June 13, 2017;  5 6 The trial currently set for July 25, 2017 be moved to a date convenient for the Court in or after October 25, 2017;  7 That the Final Pretrial Conference currently set for May 22, 2017 be moved to a date 8 convenient for the Court in accordance with the new trial date, preferably after September 9 15, 2017. 10 The parties stipulate to and request this modification of the pretrial order as to the expert 11 witness disclosures, the discovery cutoff, and the motion deadline because there has been a three- 12 month delay from the time Plaintiffs terminated prior counsel and the time new counsel filed his 13 substitution. There is good cause for this modification because the parties did not anticipate that 14 Plaintiffs would change counsel, and because neither party could conduct discovery during the 15 three month period while Plaintiffs were effectively unrepresented. The parties are confident 16 that the new dates for expert witness disclosures, discovery cutoff, and motion deadline will 17 provide all parties with adequate time to complete discovery and dispositive motions. 18 The parties also stipulate to and request this modification of the pretrial order as to the 19 dates for the final pretrial conference and trial because defense counsel, Sean O’Dowd, cannot 20 attend the pretrial conference and trial as currently scheduled, as he will be on military leave 21 starting in May 2015. The parties submitted their availability for trial to this Court on March 28, 22 2016. Court’s Docket No. 8, p. 6. At that time, defense counsel was unaware of the dates that he 23 would be on military leave. His inability to attend the pretrial conference and trial was not 24 caused by a lack of diligence in complying with the Court’s Scheduling Order. Mr. O’Dowd 25 expects to return to work in mid-September 2017. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 1 Defense counsel also wishes to notify the Court that it currently has trials scheduled to 2 begin on December 4, 2017 (Smith v. Lodi, et al, Eastern District Case 2:14-cv-01318-TLN-AC) 3 and on January 22, 2018 (Coryell v. Oroville, et al, Eastern District Case No. 2:15-cv-00476- 4 TLN-AC). 5 6 Dated: November 16, 2016 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP /s/ Sean D. O’Dowd By:_________________________________ AMIE McTAVISH SEAN D. O’DOWD Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dated: November 10, 2016 CYRUS ZAL, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION /s/ Cyrus Zal (as authorized on 11/14/16) By:_________________________________ CYRUS ZAL Attorney for Plaintiffs 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ORDER THEREFORE it is so ordered that: 1. The expert witness disclosure cut-off date currently set for November 23, 2016 is continued to February 23, 2017; 2. The rebuttal expert witness disclosure currently set for December 23, 2016 is continued to March 23, 2017; 3. The the discovery deadline currently set for January 23, 2017 is continued to April 21, 2017; 4. The deadline to file Motions currently set for March 13, 2017 is continued to June 13, 2017; 11 5. The Final Pretrial Conference currently set for May 22, 2017 is continued to September 12 25, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. Joint Pretrial Statements shall be filed by September 18, 2017. 13 6. The trial currently set for July 25, 2017 is continued to November 14, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2016 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?