Bonilla-Chirinos, et al. v. City of West Sacramento, et al.

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/18/2017 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 42 City of West Sacramento's Bill of Costs, to refiling within fourteen days after judgment is entered as to all claims and defendants in this case. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 13 14 GUILLERMO BONILLA-CHIRINOS and SANDRA HERNANDEZ, individually and as guardians ad litem of J.B., a minor, Civ. No. 2:15-2564 WBS EFB ORDER RE: BILL OF COSTS Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 v. CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and police officers KENNETH FELLOWS, MICHELLE TATE, ANTHONY HERRERA, THOMAS MAGGIANO, JENNIFER GRILLAT, ERIC ANGLE, MATTHEW LUIZ, and DAVID STALLIONS, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. ----oo0oo---Before the court is defendant City of West Sacramento’s Bill of Costs filed August 8, 2017. (Docket No. 42.) While judgment has been entered in favor of the City of West Sacramento on all claims asserted against it, other claims against other 28 1 1 defendants remain pending. 2 and because plaintiffs have not yet responded to the Bill of 3 Costs (perhaps due to the uncertain status of plaintiffs’ 4 representation by counsel), the court, in its discretion, will 5 deny the Bill of Costs without prejudice to refiling after 6 judgment has been entered with respect to all claims and all 7 defendants. 8 9 In light of this procedural posture, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant City of West Sacramento’s Bill of Costs (docket no. 42) be, and the same 10 hereby is, DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling within fourteen 11 days after judgment is entered as to all claims and defendants in 12 this case. 13 Dated: August 18, 2017 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?