Bonilla-Chirinos, et al. v. City of West Sacramento, et al.
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/5/2018 GRANTING 80 Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Appeal. (Kirksey Smith, K)
6
BRUCE A. KILDAY (SB No. 066415)
Email: bkilday@akk-law.com
KEVIN J. DEHOFF (SB No. 252106)
Email: kdehoff@akk-law.com
MELISSA T. CURRIER (SB No. 318805)
Email: mcurrier@akk-law.com
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
601 University Avenue, Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95825
7
Telecopier: (916) 564-6263
8
Attorneys for Defendants KENNETH FELLOWS, THOMAS MAGGIANO, MICHELLE
TATE, and ANTHONY HERRERA
1
2
3
4
5
9
Telephone: (916) 564-6100
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GUILLERMO BONILLA-CHIRINOS, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:15-cv-02564-WBS-EFB
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STAY MATTER PENDING
APPEAL
Date:
March 5, 2018
Time:
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom: 5
Honorable William B. Shubb
19
20
The Motion of Defendants to Stay All Proceedings Pending Appeal, came on regularly
21
for hearing on March 5, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5, at the United States District
22
Courthouse located at 501 I Street, Sacramento, California.
23
24
25
26
After considering the papers filed by the parties and any oral argument on the matter, the
Court rules as follows:
1.
All factors to be considered by the district court to evaluate the merits of
Defendants’ Motion to Stay the Proceedings weigh in favor of an Order granting the stay; and
27
2.
28
The Stay is granted, pending the result of appeal.
///
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY MATTER PENDING APPEAL
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 5, 2018
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY MATTER PENDING APPEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?