Bridgeman v. Department of California Correction et al.

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/12/18 GRANTING 26 Motion to Stay the current discovery and scheduling order. All merits-based discovery is STAYED pending theresolution of Defendants motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion. See 25 . The Court also vacates the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines in its January 16,2018 Discovery and Scheduling Order. See 23 . The Court will issue an AmendedDiscovery and Scheduling Order along with new discovery and dispositive motion deadlines inthe event that Defendants motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion is denied. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 EDWARD BRIDGEMAN, Case No. 2:15-cv-02579-JAM-AC 13 14 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 15 16 DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA CORRECTION, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Good cause appearing, Defendant’s motion to stay the current discovery and scheduling 19 order (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED. All merits-based discovery is STAYED pending the 20 resolution of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion. See ECF 21 No. 25. The Court also vacates the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines in its January 16, 22 2018 Discovery and Scheduling Order. See ECF No. 23. The Court will issue an Amended 23 Discovery and Scheduling Order along with new discovery and dispositive motion deadlines in 24 the event that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion is denied. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: March 12, 2018 28 1 [Proposed] Order (2:15-cv-02579-JAM-AC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?