Ford v. California Health Care Facility et al.

Filing 39

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/24/2017 ADOPTING in FULL 35 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING motions for injunctive relief 32 34 . (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DARREN VINCENT FORD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-2588 GEB DB P

v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

19

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

20

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On December 13, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

22

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

23

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On December 21, 2016,

24

plaintiff filed a document entitled “Objections.” (ECF No. 36.) However, a review of that

25

document shows that plaintiff is not objecting to the magistrate judge’s findings and

26

recommendations. Rather, petitioner seeks an extension of time to respond to discovery. On

27

January 20, 2017, the magistrate judge granted that request. (ECF No. 38.)

28

////
1

1

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

2

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

3

ORDERED that:

4
5
6
7

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 13, 2016 (ECF No. 35) are adopted
in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 32, 34) are denied.
Dated: January 24, 2017

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2