Young v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 60

AMENDED ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/05/19 ORDERING that within 14 days of the filing date of this order, the parties must complete and file the attached notice. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANNY GEROME YOUNG,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-2604 KJM CKD P

v.

ORDER

RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

17
18

U.S.C. § 1983.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was denied in part (ECF No. 58), and this case

19
20

is ready to proceed to trial. However, before pretrial and trial dates are set, the parties will be

21

required to complete the attached notice and file it with the court regarding whether they believe a

22

settlement conference would be beneficial in this case. If the parties believe a settlement

23

conference would be beneficial, they must also notify the court whether they waive

24

disqualification for the undersigned to hold the settlement conference or whether they request a

25

different judge. Plaintiff shall also indicate his preference to appear in person or by

26

videoconference, if available. If plaintiff fails to indicate his preference, he will be ordered to

27

appear in person. Further instructions will issue once the parties’ elections have been received.

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the filing of this

2

order, the parties must each complete and file the attached notice.

3

Dated: August 5, 2019

4
5
6
7

13:youn2604.settlement

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

DANNY GEROME YOUNG,

5
6
7

No. 2:15-cv-2604 KJM CKD P

Plaintiff,
NOTICE RE: ELECTIONS FOR
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

v.
RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

8

Defendants.

9

1. As required by court order, the parties must notify the court of the following election:

10

____ The party signing below would like to participate in a settlement conference.

11

OR
____ The party signing below does not believe that a settlement conference in this case would
be beneficial.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

AND
2. If the party signing below would like to participate in a settlement conference, they must
notify the court of the following election:
____ Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b) of the Eastern District of California, the party signing
below affirmatively requests that the assigned Magistrate Judge participate in the
settlement conference and, further, waives any claim of disqualification of the assigned
Magistrate Judge on that basis thereafter. This waiver is not to be construed as consent
to the Magistrate Judge’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).
OR

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

____ The party signing below requests that a different judge hold the settlement conference.
AND
3. Plaintiff indicates his preference by checking one:
____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference in person.
OR
____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference by video conference, if
available.

26
27

DATED:

________________________________
Plaintiff or Counsel for Defendants

28
3