Harper v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department et al.
Filing
6
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/18/2016 DIRECTING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TOMMY R. HARPER,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-2606 KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
17
18
By order filed January 6, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave
19
to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and
20
plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
21
22
23
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign
a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule
110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
27
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
28
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1
1
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
2
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
3
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
Dated: February 18, 2016
5
6
7
/harp2606.fta
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?