Benyamini v. Terry et al.
Filing
41
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/12/2018 ADOPTING 40 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 39 "motion seeking an emerg[e]ncy continuance of said matters until[ ] further notice," construed as a motion to stay is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT BENYAMINI,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-02615-TLN-EFB
v.
ORDER
TERRY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 27, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein,
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 27, 2017, are adopted in full; and
27
28
///
1
1
2
2. Plaintiff’s “motion seeking an emerg[e]ncy continuance of said matters until[ ] further
notice,” construed as a motion to stay (ECF No. 39), is denied.
3
4
Dated: 2/12/2018
5
6
7
8
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?