Blasquez-Tracy v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/22/16 ORDERING that defendant shall, no later than 10/19/16, file an amended court transcript index, specifically itemizing the records contained in the administrative transcript. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHERIE BLASQUEZ-TRACY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-2621 CKD
v.
ORDER
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment. The administrative transcript does not
18
19
contain an itemized list of the exhibits. The “List of Exhibits” simply lumps all of the “medical
20
evidence” and indicates such evidence is found at pages 312-728 of the administrative transcript.
21
Similarly, the “disability related development and documentation” indicates this evidence can be
22
found at pages 222-311. Compiling all the evidence in such a manner, without specific
23
itemization of the records found therein, does not foster meaningful review. Such a practice is
24
also contrary to the thousands of administrative transcripts heretofore submitted to this court.
25
See, e.g., court transcript indices submitted in Smith v. SS, (E.D. Cal.), case no. 2:12-cv-2707
26
CKD; Jekov v. SS, (E.D. Cal.), case no. 2:12-cv-2768 CKD, DeSchryver v. SS, (E.D. Cal.), case
27
no. 2:16-cv-146 TLN CKD.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant shall, no later than October 19,
2
2016, file an amended court transcript index, specifically itemizing the records contained in the
3
administrative transcript.
4
Dated: September 22, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
4 tracy2621.index
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?