McDaniel v. USA, et al
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/27/2021 ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations. No pre-filing order or order declaring plaintiff a vexatious litigant shall issue. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TANYA GRACE McDANIEL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2627-KJM-EFB PS
v.
ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On March 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
17
18
served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
19
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
20
21
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
22
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
23
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
24
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
2
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 9, 2021, are ADOPTED; and
3
2. No pre-filing order or order declaring plaintiff a vexatious litigant shall issue.
4
DATED: September 27, 2021.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?