Tye v. Global Travel International, Inc.

Filing 19

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/19/16 ORDERING that the court GRANTS nunc pro tunc defendants 18 motion to extend the deadline to respond to the complaint until 7/7/2016. The court deems defendant's 17 answer to be filed. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY E. TYE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-02654-KJM-AC v. ORDER GLOBAL TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff filed a complaint on December 23, 2015. ECF No. 1. The court granted 18 19 two stipulated requests to extend the time for defendant to respond to the complaint, which 20 extended the deadline to respond to July 1, 2016. ECF Nos. 6 & 12. On June 29, 2016, the 21 parties filed a third stipulated request to extend the time to respond to the complaint until August 22 1, 2016. ECF No. 15. The court denied the request on July 5, 2016. ECF No. 16. On July 7, 2016, defendant filed a request to file its answer after the deadline and a 23 24 copy of the proposed answer. ECF Nos. 17 & 18. Because defendant promptly filed its answer 25 upon the court’s denial of the third request for an extension, and in the interest of resolving the 26 matter on the merits, the court GRANTS nunc pro tunc defendant’s motion to extend the deadline 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 to respond to the complaint until July 7, 2016 (ECF No. 18). The court deems defendant’s 2 answer (ECF No. 17) to be filed. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 19, 2016 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?