Tyes v. Sherman

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/26/2017 WITHDRAWING 16 Order to Show Cause. Petitioner to file opposition to 12 Motion to Dismiss on or before 1/15/2018. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTHUR EUGENE TYES, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 v. No. 2:15-cv-02655-JAM-GGH ORDER STUART SHERMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner appears in pro se and in forma pauperis in this habeas matter. On December 21, 17 18 2017 this court issued an Order to Show Cause why his failure to file opposition to respondent’s 19 motion to dismiss his petition should not be deemed a waiver of such opposition thereby 20 permitting it to grant the motion as unopposed or he should file an opposition. ECF No. 16. 21 Petitioner chose to respond to the Order but did not file an opposition. The court finds 22 petitioner’s explanation for his failure to oppose credible and therefore dismisses the Order to 23 Show Cause. Petitioner has had ample time to review the Motion to Dismiss. The court will therefore 24 25 require him to file an Opposition on or before January 15, 2018. Should he again fail to so file 26 this court will recommend that his petition be dismissed with prejudice. There will be no further 27 extensions. 28 //// 1 1 In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 The Order to Show cause issued on December 21, 2017, ECF No. 16, is hereby withdrawn. 4 2. 5 January 15, 2018. 6 3. 7 8 9 10 11 Petitioner shall file an Opposition to the pending motion to dismiss on or before Petitioner is cautioned that a failure to file the foregoing Opposition timely shall lead to a recommendation that his petition be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 26, 2017 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?